4 ms·
Your desire is that reckless disregard for human life, tampering with evidence and lying on official government documents aren't crimes unless a person is physi
by hermannj314 3y ago
Your desire is that reckless disregard for human life, tampering with evidence and lying on official government documents aren't crimes unless a person is physically hurt?
Got it, most people in our democracy disagree with you, but feel free to vote in the next election.
- kurisufag 3y agoyour comment is unhelpful and unnecessarily aggressive. a better way to express the same sentiment would be pointing out the reasons that evidence tampering, despite not having an immediate victim, can be harmful.
- hermannj314 3y agoI don't support your demand for asymmetric debate. If anything, unconventional positions require extra effort by the claimant not the respondent. Parent didn't supply evidence and took a position that crimes that have existed for hundreds of years shouldn't be illegal. I dont see why the onus is on the respondent to furnish overwhelming evidence to counter that. I am fine stating that this position is out of touch with our democracy. Sorry that isn't sufficient for you.
- can16358p 3y agoDisregard for human life? Putting others in danger: should be punished. Putting self in danger in a remote location: he can do whatever he wants with their life, even kill themselves if they want.