4 ms·
> Bond reform designed to make sure no one stays in jail while their cases are pending with no safety net to handle more criminals on the streets, At the time
by thebooktocome 3y ago
> Bond reform designed to make sure no one stays in jail while their cases are pending with no safety net to handle more criminals on the streets,
At the time you make bond, you have merely been charged with a crime—you are not a criminal. I’m sure a prosecutor does get tired of having to argue cases against defendants who were able, by virtue of habeas corpus, to prepare a defense.
> shorter parole periods, lower sentences for repeat offenders,
Things that mitigate real inequities present when the justice system interacts with poor people.
> the malicious and unnecessary prosecution of law enforcement officers,
This is a terrible thing to say in a world where police officers have no obligation to serve and extraordinary legal defenses that protect them from almost every form of wrongdoing.
> overuse of diversion programs,
The United States already incarcerates a relatively large fraction of the world’s children. He would prefer incarcerating more.
> intentionally not pursuing prosecutions for crimes lawfully on the books after being passed by our legislature and signed by a governor,
This prosecutor has had this power for twenty years, and I’m certain he’s used it freely. He’s likely used it to protect people he feels sympathy toward, and refrained from using it to protect people he feels no sympathy toward. He’s likely used it because he feels overworked or under-appreciated.
> all of these so-called reforms have had a direct negative impact, with consequences that will last for a generation.
As a prosecutor, he had wide-reaching legal power to make his community a better place. What did he do instead? To hear him tell it, he was the one in prison for twenty years.
- DebtDeflation 3y ago>This is a terrible thing to say in a world where police officers have no obligation to serve and extraordinary legal defenses that protect them from almost every form of wrongdoing. Yeah, the author lost me here. I'm all for law and order when it comes to catching and prosecuting murderers, rapists, kidnappers, armed robbers, etc. However, I've seen FAR too many videos of situations where there was no crime that had been committed and no threat to public safety when a police officer showed up and escalated a non-issue into a serious situation that resulted in someone being killed, beaten, and/or arrested for no real reason. There has to be some sort of middle ground.
- plagiarist 3y agoThere is no malicious or unnecessary prosecution of police in the entire country that I am aware of. There's some grudging prosecution when they do something so egregious and so public that it horrifies the nation.
- mindslight 3y agoSame here. On the other points I can give the benefit of the doubt and at least see where they're coming from. But unless the author is going to list specific cases where citizens that also happen to be law enforcement officers were "maliciously" prosecuted, then I can only assume this is reactionary nonsense about the movement to create any sort of accountability for police officers.
- P_I_Staker 3y agoAgree on every one of your points. This is a truly sickening thing to read on HN.