5 ms·
I really don't get this. Swindler has 0% relatedness to mark?
by webstrand 3y ago
I really don't get this. Swindler has 0% relatedness to mark?
- 0xdada 3y agoalso, bank and note are only 15% related
- Lewton 3y agosimilarly "scam" is only 2% related to mark I'd expect scam to be squarely in the middle between investor and mark :D
- NeoTar 3y agoI expected Germany to link to 'mark' (i.e. the former currency), but apparently not.
- taneq 3y ago"scam" was my first try, too. I would have thought it would be strongly related to both "investor" and "mark"?
- grammarxcore 3y agoI feel like the two are already equal in certain circles (eg the crypto space) so, as many comments are pointing out, understanding how relationships are built is important. That being said, if the black box is revealed, it’s not really a guessing game any more.
- tgv 3y agoI tried "money", because that seems pretty related to investor and also to mark (a monetary unit, not only German, but also an old English/Scottish equivalent of 13s 4p, if you can make sense of that), but the strength is only 16% and 2%, according to whatever embedding model they use.