3 ms·

Which is a quote outside of the article, so the article itself doesn't contribute that much. :D The more funny part is how the article talks about men who sit

Which is a quote outside of the article, so the article itself doesn't contribute that much. :D The more funny part is how the article talks about men who sit at home, play games, and watch porn, and later calls them "warriors".

eimrine 3y ago
I tried to find all occurences of "warrior" and have found zero cases when the porn-watchers considered warriors. As far as I understood: a warrior is a man from past, a strong personality who were able to fight literally against everybody else: Alfred Lothar Wegener, Clair Cameron Patterson, Giordano Bruno etc. Now imagine a modern version Clair Patterson, the guy who used to fight and won against something supported by all money in the world (!) and suddenly some lady claims that he touched her butt when she was 17.
- gostsamo 3y ago
  The opening of the article is actually lamenting how the men have been send to watch porn at home while later it explains how at the past they would've been warring in the open. And both in the past and today a single witness without colaborating evidence would be called "a bitch" "a whore", and "you've gotten what you deserve". Even today we have whistle blowers, but the way to deal with them is not through the manufactured culture conflicts, but through old fashioned brut force tactics.
  - eimrine 3y ago
    > The opening of the article is actually lamenting how the men have been send to watch porn at home while later it explains how at the past they would've been warring in the open. I understood it in such a way that men realized that there is some porn on the Internets and they chooses to stop being a warriors. If my understanding is wrong - than the men have been sent to watch porn by whom? Feminists? God? Vinton Gray Cerf? > And both in the past and today a single witness without colaborating evidence would be called "a bitch" "a whore", and "you've gotten what you deserve". But what if the witness is strong enough to be not refused? I can not forget when Brendan Eich stopped being CEO of Mosilla because he donated a thousand dollars to some traditional (anti-gay) movement. Even RMS has been fired from FSF just for defending Marvin Minsky. These guys are the best possible candidates for their workplaces. > Even today we have whistle blowers, but the way to deal with them is not through the manufactured culture conflicts, but through old fashioned brut force tactics. I know only one example to your words and not from science/technology (Jonny vs Amber).
abrett 3y ago
I would like to see the part where I claimed that men who sit at home and watch porn are warriors. Could you provide the quote for me? I need to make sure that I go back and change it. Pretty sure I didn't say that though.

eimrine 3y ago

I tried to find all occurences of "warrior" and have found zero cases when the porn-watchers considered warriors. As far as I understood: a warrior is a man from past, a strong personality who were able to fight literally against everybody else: Alfred Lothar Wegener, Clair Cameron Patterson, Giordano Bruno etc. Now imagine a modern version Clair Patterson, the guy who used to fight and won against something supported by all money in the world (!) and suddenly some lady claims that he touched her butt when she was 17.

gostsamo 3y ago
The opening of the article is actually lamenting how the men have been send to watch porn at home while later it explains how at the past they would've been warring in the open. And both in the past and today a single witness without colaborating evidence would be called "a bitch" "a whore", and "you've gotten what you deserve". Even today we have whistle blowers, but the way to deal with them is not through the manufactured culture conflicts, but through old fashioned brut force tactics.
- eimrine 3y ago
  > The opening of the article is actually lamenting how the men have been send to watch porn at home while later it explains how at the past they would've been warring in the open. I understood it in such a way that men realized that there is some porn on the Internets and they chooses to stop being a warriors. If my understanding is wrong - than the men have been sent to watch porn by whom? Feminists? God? Vinton Gray Cerf? > And both in the past and today a single witness without colaborating evidence would be called "a bitch" "a whore", and "you've gotten what you deserve". But what if the witness is strong enough to be not refused? I can not forget when Brendan Eich stopped being CEO of Mosilla because he donated a thousand dollars to some traditional (anti-gay) movement. Even RMS has been fired from FSF just for defending Marvin Minsky. These guys are the best possible candidates for their workplaces. > Even today we have whistle blowers, but the way to deal with them is not through the manufactured culture conflicts, but through old fashioned brut force tactics. I know only one example to your words and not from science/technology (Jonny vs Amber).

abrett 3y ago

I would like to see the part where I claimed that men who sit at home and watch porn are warriors. Could you provide the quote for me? I need to make sure that I go back and change it. Pretty sure I didn't say that though.