2 ms·
Yes, that's the "100 lines of SQL to do the same" the previous poster mentioned (obviously they were exaggerating a bit and it's less than literally 100 lines,
by arp242 4y ago
Yes, that's the "100 lines of SQL to do the same" the previous poster mentioned (obviously they were exaggerating a bit and it's less than literally 100 lines, but it's pretty complex).