3 ms·
> I think the cards should just be what the post is, not a description of it. This would make the blue look-into-it-more button useless > the creators value j
by aprilnya 3y ago
> I think the cards should just be what the post is, not a description of it.
This would make the blue look-into-it-more button useless
> the creators value judgments are inserted (for instance “ethnic slur” is ambiguous in many real cases, eg negro could be legit in a spanish-speaking or referencing context, or “white trash” which could both be a slur and the title of an edgy Vice documentary).
You’re supposed to use the blue look-into-it-more button to figure this kind of stuff out
- mike741 3y ago> You’re supposed to use the blue look-into-it-more button Isn't that the problem? If a report is in regards to the content of a post, and we have limited time, why not start with the actual content being reported first and have the reporter's arbitrary comments be secondary?
- klabb3 3y agoThat button was just weird and added extra time, while speed was a goal. Also I don’t think that button always had raw user content, it was also sometimes just a description, just with more details like a hint. Iirc
- aprilnya 3y agoyes. the point of the button is to add extra time. the point of the button is to decide if you want to make a decision based on the limited context you have directly in front of you or do you want to spend some time getting more context to make a better decision. which is absolutely a thing in real moderation