4 ms·
They might not settle on that as the most likely interpretation, but I would bet money that it was one of if not the first interpretation that came to mind for
by philosopher1234 3y ago
They might not settle on that as the most likely interpretation, but I would bet money that it was one of if not the first interpretation that came to mind for most. I think title authors are accountable for such things, and less discriminating readers will not make their way all the way to more reasonable interpretations.
- cogitoergofutuo 3y agoIt is not the author’s job to proactively search out and adjust for crazy interpretations of mundane sentences. That rule would be funny. “NOAA reports record hurricane activity — BUT DON’T WORRY HAARP ISN’T INVOLVED” would be a hilarious but pointless headline.