3 ms·
It's not pedantic, because I think you are misrepresenting the author. You're edited "quote" is not actually what he said, but you justify not reading the artic
by fjh 15y ago
It's not pedantic, because I think you are misrepresenting the author. You're edited "quote" is not actually what he said, but you justify not reading the article using your misreading of the sentence you quoted.
- monochromatic 15y agoI don't think so. Every patented invention is also an instance of a broader, unpatentable class. Patent a novel electric motor that gets better efficiency than anything ever made before? Well, obviously the examiners don't know what they're doing, because you just patented an electric motor. See what I mean?