>> My point was btrfs isn't considered a serious competitor to ZFS in many of the spaces ZFS operates. > raid1c2, raid1c3 and raid1c4 will get you close > not

>> My point was btrfs isn't considered a serious competitor to ZFS in many of the spaces ZFS operates. > raid1c2, raid1c3 and raid1c4 will get you close > not a lot. I guess I just don't understand this take. btrfs doesn't do what ZFS does, and still isn't as reliable as ZFS is. When it is, maybe I'll take another look. But this is really the problem with btrfs stans -- they've been saying it's ready, when it's not, for years. Fix the small stuff. Make it reliable. Quit making promises about how it's as good as ZFS, when it's clear it doesn't do all the things ZFS does, just some of the things most of the time.