3 ms·
Uhm wasn't the Nexus 7 the tablet that literally bricked itself within a year by the storage degrading to floppy speed?
by stefan_ 3y ago
Uhm wasn't the Nexus 7 the tablet that literally bricked itself within a year by the storage degrading to floppy speed?
- ollien 3y agoThe 1st gen Nexus 7, yes https://www.anandtech.com/show/7185/android-43-update-brings-trim-to-all-nexus-devices https://www.anandtech.com/show/7185/android-43-update-brings...
- maxfurman 3y agoThat's the 2012 model. Easy mistake
- bdurbin 3y agoI really liked that one, until it stopped working. In my opinion, it was the perfect size for reading and browsing the web. I haven't used a tablet as part of my daily life since then.
- Rebelgecko 3y agoNo, mine is still going strong. Obviously not running the latest version of Android since it's a decade old, but it's perfectly fine as an eReader or for light web browsing (it does struggle a bit with JS-heavy sites)
- noarchy 3y ago>Uhm So strange to see these fillers typed out on HN and reddit. >wasn't the Nexus 7 the tablet that literally bricked itself within a year by the storage degrading to floppy speed? The 2012 version that I owned did precisely that. It was a great device for the time, and it is unfortunate that they discontinued it after just a few iterations.
- anderspitman 3y agoIt's not a filler in this context
- noarchy 3y ago>It's not a filler in this context What is it supposed to be?
- culopatin 3y agoNot a year, I definitely got way more use than that. But yes.