Was this the most damning fact uncovered by the House investigation into this report? That there was a researcher working on it who wasn't properly credited? Th

Was this the most damning fact uncovered by the House investigation into this report? That there was a researcher working on it who wasn't properly credited? That in itself doesn't seem like reason to discard the report, let alone to reach the opposite conclusion. And of course there has been subsequent research by independent scientists who also reached the conclusion that a zoonotic origin is most likely. I'm not saying the lab leak theory has been conclusively disproved -- it hasn't -- but certainly neither has the wildlife theory.