4 ms·
You are not. It's like Patrick Bateman's Fisher-Price to me. This thing in particular is purely for posers, even more than their other stuff. I find it condesc
by mandmandam 3y ago
You are not. It's like Patrick Bateman's Fisher-Price to me.
This thing in particular is purely for posers, even more than their other stuff. I find it condescending, and nebulously offensive.
- amoss 3y ago> Patrick Bateman's Fisher-Price Oh wow, that one is going in the memory bank for future use.
- dpflan 3y agoIndeed, my mind field recorded that one!
- thewataccount 3y agoI have literally no experience with music or any of this stuff. I've seen a few videos and the OP1 looks cool - how do these things perform? Are they decent but expensive, or are they just pretty but trash? IMO Apple pulls this off well because their devices work really decently while also holding that premium look.
- mandmandam 3y agoThey are ridiculously overpriced. They are terribly limited, which is marketed as a bonus - I don't see it that way. I wouldn't go so far as to call them trash - they're very expensive toys. You may enjoy this video about the OP-1's feature set, even without the background knowledge to know everything he's saying is 100% true (which it is) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU8alMWUmDI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU8alMWUmDI I like Apple, quite possibly too much. I put a lot of value on user experience. But I would never buy a Teenage Engineering product with my own money. I find that 'I only drink $500 bottles of wine' kind of thing deeply uncool.
- dpflan 3y ago“Patrick Bateman’s Fischer-Price” is a superb phrase, captures the essence of the situation. I can see Bateman and friends comparing their devices one upping each other - this one has “embossed buttons”…etc!