3 ms·
I can't help but cringe when looking at the dependency count when using some javascript framework to write client-side code. I think the frameworks and the ecos
by harha_ 3y ago
I can't help but cringe when looking at the dependency count when using some javascript framework to write client-side code. I think the frameworks and the ecosystem is overly complex and the same could be accomplished by embracing minimalism. I do like things such as babel and webpack though, but those are dev-dependencies which is unrelated to the contents of the final bundle and I can live with few dev dependencies.
For my last project I wrote just plain old javascript without any frameworks, but I did use dev dependencies such as the ones I mentioned above. It was a breeze to implement things, but I do understand that the benefits of frameworks like React become clear in larger more complex projects. So all in all I don't really know what should I think about the current state of the ecosystem, nor am I really on the edge of the wave of progress, but the kind of feelings I often get is in the lines of 'is this dependency x really needed here? what does it do? oh it does this small little thing, why is it here??'...
- ipaddr 3y agoWish we had something simple like jQuery
- Etheryte 3y agoI mean you can still use jQuery, no one's stopping you. They're still releasing new versions with updates, the last one came out two months ago if I'm not mistaken.
- ilrwbwrkhv 3y agoJust use mithril
- potta_coffee 3y agoVanilla Javascript is comfortable. I think I've pretty much given up on the JS ecosystem. I've been going back to web frameworks like Django / Rails / Laravel. Obviously not the solution for all things but most projects really don't need to be SPAs.