3 ms·
> The lockdowns went on far longer than the "flatten the curve" phase. Did they? Is the table on wikipedia wrong? Outside of California (which I feel no desire
by jjoonathan 3y ago
> The lockdowns went on far longer than the "flatten the curve" phase.
Did they? Is the table on wikipedia wrong? Outside of California (which I feel no desire to defend), it looks like the actual lockdowns were 0-3 months.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_lockdowns https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_lockdowns
0-3 months doesn't sound nutty to me. Perhaps 3 months was a bit on the high side, sure, but it's also on the high side of actual policy. What does strike me as nutty was the extreme rhetoric around extremely basic Rt reduction measures. Washing hands, social distancing, wearing masks, taking temperatures, installing spit shields etc just don't deserve nearly the same level of vitriol as the lockdowns themselves, but people seem awfully keen to fudge the distinction. Next time we should start those measures out of the gate but I am worried that people will jump right back into the game of pretending that basic public health measures = extreme oppression, sending us down the exact same path as 2020.
- School-Cotton 3y agoSorry but I consider social distancing measures and forced mask wearing to be "lockdowns", colloquially, as do many other people. The life-altering consequences of COVID policy lasted much, much longer than three months.