3 ms·
All that is in reality is employers subsidising people's decision to live somewhere with an outrageous commute (ie generally far away from urban centres). Peopl
by DoughnutHole 3y ago
All that is in reality is employers subsidising people's decision to live somewhere with an outrageous commute (ie generally far away from urban centres). People who chose to live in urban centres close to where they're likely to work with shorter travel times are now being effectively penalised for making a responsible decision.
Alternatively we could force employers to pay for commutes but allow them to factor that into hiring decisions. If I have to pay you as if you worked 60 hours because you have a ridiculous 2 hour each way commute I'm just going to hire someone who lives 30 minutes away instead.
- Spivak 3y ago> penalised for making a responsible decision You're applying a lot of judgement there. I too base all my life decisions on whether they're good for my employer. > I'm just going to hire someone who lives 30 minutes away instead That and the time you no longer waste from a long commute sounds pretty good for the urbanite so it evens out.