3 ms·
"Worse for who?" is the question a lot of people should have asked. I'm not responding to this thread anymore. People are still cultish about this discussion.
by sergiotapia 3y ago
"Worse for who?" is the question a lot of people should have asked. I'm not responding to this thread anymore. People are still cultish about this discussion.
- jjoonathan 3y agoWorse for everyone. It's absolutely wild that you think elementary public health is a conspiracy.
- runsWphotons 3y agoMany Countries which did little had better results. Arguable that all efforts outside protecting nursing homes were futile or harmful.
- jjoonathan 3y agoBy "many countries" do you mean "Sweden, if you cut off the data right before their big wave"?
- runsWphotons 3y agoIt isn't just Sweden and even where you may have some questions about the data, it is no small thing for countries which put fewer restrictions to have rates which are of the same magnitude as those with heavier restrictions, given the huge costs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rate...
- ethanbond 3y ago"I would go on living my life with literal airborne HIV... [other] people are still cultish about this discussion"