> Like I don't get it, would it have been propaganda if they praised COVID measures or? Yes, I am pointing out their bias. There is plenty of propaganda on the

> Like I don't get it, would it have been propaganda if they praised COVID measures or? Yes, I am pointing out their bias. There is plenty of propaganda on the other side, but people aren't posting articles from Mother Jones or Salon or Breitbart on here. In an article about energy deaths a COVID comparison feels very shoe-horned in. Propaganda can be factual, nothing in this article was not factual, but it's still propaganda. I find that the primary purpose of The Economist is to be propaganda, it has little intellectual value. Which is the point of the rest of my comment.