4 ms·
Cool! Here is a little smaller version of yours. Spaces and color abbreviation. That word “background” sure is big here. <svg width="18" height="18" viewBox="-
by social_quotient 3y ago
Cool! Here is a little smaller version of yours. Spaces and color abbreviation. That word “background” sure is big here.
<svg width="18" height="18" viewBox="-32 -32 64 64" style="background:#f60;border:1px #fff solid;"><rect x="-3" y="-2" width="6" height="24" fill="#fff" id="rc1"/><use href="#rc1" y="-22" transform="rotate(-34) scale(1, 1.2)" id="rc2"/><use href="#rc2" transform="scale(-1,1)"/><rect x="-30" y="-30" width="60" height="12" fill="#f60"/></svg>
- b112 3y agoStop it! If you bastards optimize this any more, you'll hit the fractal limit, and drop into negative optimized space, renting local spacetime, killing us all! Is it really worth it? Is it?!?!
- bambax 3y agoOk, but my point was to be readable and easy to understand by using elementary shapes (rectangles), not to be as small as possible. (My version is much bigger than the comment it was replying to.)