> You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; > What he didn't consider was the effect the written word had on a social scale in terms of bein

> You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; > What he didn't consider was the effect the written word had on a social scale in terms of being able to exchange ideas over physical and temporal distances. Why would his words be less potent when applied to billions of people, as opposed to only a few? Are those billions not just as susceptible to fallacy as the elite few?