4 ms·
Am I the only one unimpressed with the quality? The render quality and the buffering is poor, it's not quite photorealistic as they claim, it might be possible
by luke-stanley 3y ago
Am I the only one unimpressed with the quality? The render quality and the buffering is poor, it's not quite photorealistic as they claim, it might be possible to render it nicely such that it is photoreal but that's not what they are showing in their own videos. Stablediffusion and Controlnet exist but what this needs is probably just some better sampling and attention to preloading.
- circuit10 3y agoIt’s much better than anything that was publicly available before
- andybak 3y agoI refer the honorable gentleperson to my answer elsewhere on this page: > Not to pull the whole "Everything Is Amazing And Nobody Is Happy" on you but pause to consider the sheer scale of the dataset. 2500 cities have geometry data to the level where you can see details on individual buildings for areas extending well out into the suburbs. > Yes - it's blurred up close but my god, isn't it still amazing?