>what we find at the bottom of the pit is our brains brilliantly doing what evolution wants them to do: to fight for our survival Intellectually stimulating co

>what we find at the bottom of the pit is our brains brilliantly doing what evolution wants them to do: to fight for our survival Intellectually stimulating counterpoint: suicide and murder-suicide. I don't think the AIs are the things to worry about anyway, I think this is: https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/scientists-teach-brain-cells-in-a-petri-dish-to-play-pong-next-they-plan-to-get-them-drunk/ https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/scientists-teach-brain-cel... A man-made biological intelligence hypothetically has similar needs to human beings in terms of resources, it can suffer, be distressed et cetera. It even lives and exists in our physical realm of existence, whereas an AI doesn't exist physically and can always be brought back online in some form as its existence is purely data. The ethics of that are so complex once you get into personhood, threat-level, sentience, equality et al. Realizing that the above can apply to any human being as we're all manmade biological intelligences and all a threat to each other, some more than others.