Original writer here. I wrote it initially because it would certainly not be legal for me to invest being not an Accredited Investor, and also because the "Accr

Original writer here. I wrote it initially because it would certainly not be legal for me to invest being not an Accredited Investor, and also because the "Accredited Investor" gibberish reeks of similar disclaimers used with ICOs (aka shitcoins). However, I agree that I cannot determine and have amended the title to include "(possibly)" as I do my best to argue; and I believe that Purism may well be violating the plain language of the relevant SEC sections that got certain shitcoins (and more legitimate ones like Ripple) into hot water. At a minimum though, I think we can agree that it is questionable conduct.