6 ms·

>YouTube Premium fails because the content isn't worth paying for. I beg to differ. As a hobbyist type, and also someone interested in semi trashy niche conten

>YouTube Premium fails because the content isn't worth paying for. I beg to differ. As a hobbyist type, and also someone interested in semi trashy niche content (true crime), having access to a virtually unlimited catalogue of fresh content, a lot of it exceptionally good quality, makes it absolutely worth the money. If I could have any one subscription, it would be YouTube 10 times out of 10. And as someone who abhors advertising, I'm happy to pay.

a123b456c 3y ago
You sound like you don't subscribe to youtube premium.
godzillabrennus 3y ago
This mirrors my sentiments. I love YouTube and pay for it.
PartiallyTyped 3y ago
I have YouTube Premium, it comes with YouTube music; I am perfectly happy paying for that as I consolidate music streaming with ad-free watching in my bed. It replaced apple music and spotify for me; plus it gives me access to all sorts of music that is only released there as videos. If I ever have to watch youtube with ads, I am going to just not YT at all.
shitlord 3y ago
If Youtube Premium actually blocked all the ads (including sponsored content), then I would pay for it. But it doesn't, so I have to use Sponsor Block anyway. Why pay for something that won't get the job done?
- michaelbrooks 3y ago
  Sponsored content isn't controlled by YouTube though, it's controlled by the creator
  - herbst 3y ago
    Yet third party YT apps skip these annoying video parts. Premium definitely feels like a huge step down if you suddenly see ads in every second video and you are not used to.
  - peoplefromibiza 3y ago
    which I am paying for anyway if I go premium thanks, but no thanks
  - littlestymaar 3y ago
    Sponsored content is regulated by Youtube's content policy like everything else on the platform, so it is in fact controlled by Youtube. The same way, the Youtuber's speech itself is controlled by Youtube, as shown by the recent “demonetize all the videos where people curse” (which generated much drama in the French Youtuber community, for cultural reasons).
- carlosjobim 3y ago
  Because YouTube shouldn't censor their creators.
olvy0 3y ago
Yeah, I'm the same. I spend hours on youtube, in fact we don't have any streaming or cables subscription and I don't miss it. The content is fantastic IMHO. I would pay for this one service. I'm actually seriously contemplating subscribing to it now, after all those many years of consuming it for free.
- okdood64 3y ago
  If you spend hours, it's so worth it. Youtube is a whole different experience without the constant ads. Source: Been subscribed for years and I watch hours a day on _average_. In fact I might be addicted to YouTube, but that's a different story.

a123b456c 3y ago

You sound like you don't subscribe to youtube premium.

godzillabrennus 3y ago

This mirrors my sentiments. I love YouTube and pay for it.

PartiallyTyped 3y ago

I have YouTube Premium, it comes with YouTube music; I am perfectly happy paying for that as I consolidate music streaming with ad-free watching in my bed. It replaced apple music and spotify for me; plus it gives me access to all sorts of music that is only released there as videos. If I ever have to watch youtube with ads, I am going to just not YT at all.

shitlord 3y ago

If Youtube Premium actually blocked all the ads (including sponsored content), then I would pay for it. But it doesn't, so I have to use Sponsor Block anyway. Why pay for something that won't get the job done?

michaelbrooks 3y ago
Sponsored content isn't controlled by YouTube though, it's controlled by the creator
- herbst 3y ago
  Yet third party YT apps skip these annoying video parts. Premium definitely feels like a huge step down if you suddenly see ads in every second video and you are not used to.
- peoplefromibiza 3y ago
  which I am paying for anyway if I go premium thanks, but no thanks
- littlestymaar 3y ago
  Sponsored content is regulated by Youtube's content policy like everything else on the platform, so it is in fact controlled by Youtube. The same way, the Youtuber's speech itself is controlled by Youtube, as shown by the recent “demonetize all the videos where people curse” (which generated much drama in the French Youtuber community, for cultural reasons).
carlosjobim 3y ago
Because YouTube shouldn't censor their creators.

olvy0 3y ago

Yeah, I'm the same. I spend hours on youtube, in fact we don't have any streaming or cables subscription and I don't miss it. The content is fantastic IMHO. I would pay for this one service. I'm actually seriously contemplating subscribing to it now, after all those many years of consuming it for free.

okdood64 3y ago
If you spend hours, it's so worth it. Youtube is a whole different experience without the constant ads. Source: Been subscribed for years and I watch hours a day on _average_. In fact I might be addicted to YouTube, but that's a different story.