9 ms·
YouTube premium was probably the best decision I did. Amount of time saved on ads alone makes it worth it. Other bonus feature - downloading videos. If you make
by cryptoegorophy 3y ago
YouTube premium was probably the best decision I did. Amount of time saved on ads alone makes it worth it. Other bonus feature - downloading videos. If you make enough money it is a no brainer together with things like extra cloud storage from google, Apple and now ChatGPT
- deebosong 3y agoThese days, I'll happily not use a service/ product/ whatever if I have to pay for it. But YouTube Premium, ad free, is wonderful. I bought it for my parents because they watch a lot of niche stuff. But now that I have it, it's worth even the crazy price increase (to like, $22/mo or something). I like it better than Netflix/ Disney+/ HBO Max, as it's half entertainment, half educational (whereas the other streaming services are more entertainment and often doesn't keep me interested in spite of their catalogues).
- naikrovek 3y agothe Family sharing of YouTube Premium is worth every penny I pay for it times 5. easily.
- alwayslikethis 3y agoYou can save even more time by using SponsorBlock. I believe premium only gives you fake downloading -- you can't take it out of their app (correct me if I'm wrong). In contrast yt-dlp gives you direct access to the files.
- naikrovek 3y agoYouTube premium downloading does store the video in the browser data store I think, yes. I use yt-dlp for videos I want to keep a copy of, which are few and far between, and I use YT premium's download feature to queue up stuff I want to watch on my phone later when I know I'm going to a poor coverage area. there's room for both solutions in my world.
- judge2020 3y agoTrue - With RIAA and such making YT implement something that looks like DRM just to say they have DRM on songs, I don't think YT is ready to actually offer downloading other peoples' videos from their official UI. For those that don't want to mess with yt-dlp, it's easy enough to search "youtube downloader" on Google.
- WheatMillington 3y agoI'm a heavy YouTube user (by my own standards... 2-3 hours a day) and a happy premium subscriber, and I totally agree that sponsorblock is a must-have.
- swapfile 3y ago>YouTube premium was probably the best decision I did. Amount of time saved on ads alone makes it worth it. Why do you get ads? I don't understand how there are people on Hacker News that don't use content blockers. Is is because of principle?
- jamilton 3y agoUses the app on iPhone maybe? There's probably an app that bypasses ads though.
- swapfile 3y agoAh. I was forgetting people use locked down devices where content blocking isn't possible, or a hassle.
- cryptoegorophy 3y agoYeah. I use iPhone. There is 1block but I am not sure if it blocks YouTube ads since I haven’t tested.
- bobbylarrybobby 3y agoIt blocks them in safari (since it's a safari extension) but not in any other app
- Brusco_RF 3y agoI just watch from the Brave browser, built in ad-blocker
- nixass 3y agoI think that's biggest issue in this thread. People locked down into their devices not even realizing there's relatively free-er world outside their locked-device bubble.
- deleted 3y ago
- water-your-self 3y ago[flagged]
- cryptoegorophy 3y agoIt is just one of those things that is a no brainer. Same for me was iCloud storage.
- dang 3y agoThis is a form of personal attack which degrades discussion and breaks the site guidelines, so could you please not? https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html