4 ms·
From the article: > "The two areas where we see automated writing tools for SEO purposes having an advantage will be ... 2) generating content that is not wate
by varenc 3y ago
From the article:
> "The two areas where we see automated writing tools for SEO purposes having an advantage will be ... 2) generating content that is not watermarked by Google as synthetic content."
Wow. They're basically saying that AI tools will lets SEOers generate content that isn't detected as "synthetic content" by Google, even though it clearly is synthetic. It's surprising to see the SEO industry acknowledge this so directly. Whether the generated content is useful or not, I'm now even more ready for the world where 90% of my queries can be answered on search engines directly since it's just cutting out the middleman.
- rgrieselhuber 3y agoThis basically came down to being “allowed” after Google announced that they would not penalize content simply because it was fully or partially synthetic. What they say matters is how helpful that content is. Whether or not synthetic = spam is probably a longer discussion.