3 ms·
Sure, but there is literally ZERO incentive to be a "good" player here. If Youtube doesn't have ads and relied solely on premium they will probably not survive
by anon-3988 3y ago
Sure, but there is literally ZERO incentive to be a "good" player here. If Youtube doesn't have ads and relied solely on premium they will probably not survive without going into an insane amount of debt.
If consumers do pay for premium, then consumers at least have a moral leverage they can use against Youtube. As it stands, consumers are in the "wrong" here.
Either:
1. We agree that ads is justified.
2. Or Youtube as a service and many like it (free service) does not make sense and should not be made illegal if it can't make profit. It will literally bleed money for the rest of eternity and can only survive by going into debt.