Please note that, the Go proposal is for both "for-range" loops and traditional "for;;" c-like loops. I think it is okay to make the change for "for-range" loo

Please note that, the Go proposal is for both "for-range" loops and traditional "for;;" c-like loops. I think it is okay to make the change for "for-range" loops, but not okay for traditional "for;;" c-like loops.