4 ms·
I don't misunderstand it. I know the facts in C#. But the Go proposal is different. The proposed change is for both "for;;" loops and "for-range" loops.
by tapirl 3y ago
I don't misunderstand it. I know the facts in C#. But the Go proposal is different. The proposed change is for both "for;;" loops and "for-range" loops.
- electroly 3y agoI was referring to the HN poster "Someone" at the beginning of this subthread, my apologies for the confusion--I didn't want to name them explicitly in my post since that feels a little aggressive. They said C# 5 made this change, which is wrong; that's why I explained with a C# snippet. This subthread isn't referring to your post at all.