3 ms·
You are reading much more expansive claims into my wording then the actual claim. I quite carefully chose the wording. For example, the 24 fps limit is only re
by MichaelZuo 4y ago
You are reading much more expansive claims into my wording then the actual claim. I quite carefully chose the wording.
For example, the 24 fps limit is only regarding fooling the brain into perceiving motion, I never commented on the qualitative perception of said motion. Or whether this motion could be revealed to be fake by inserting interstitial frames, etc.
- lazide 4y agoPeople ‘see’ motion at 8fps too. It’s just a bit more jarring sometimes. And people can tell it’s artificial even at 60fps. I wasn’t talking about faking motion by interspersing interstitials, I’m saying some people (but not all) can reliably detect a single ‘bad’ interstitial frames presence at 60+ fps. The majority of your examples are the same kind of BS you keep trying to sell. Approximations, and generalizations, often trivially disprovable with even a little research and/or independent thinking.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoYou are again not carefully reading what I wrote. So it's not worth my time to continue providing a substantive response. Maybe another passing reader will chime in, but I doubt it considering nearly all HN readers would prefer to avoid engaging with low-effort dismissals lacking in credibility.