3 ms·
Agreed on all points, and yet it's still terrible. It does a 2000s-era "fuzzy search" which is infuriating, and just straight up misses exact matches all the ti
by spopejoy 3y ago
Agreed on all points, and yet it's still terrible. It does a 2000s-era "fuzzy search" which is infuriating, and just straight up misses exact matches all the time.
Indeed I end up using the date filter as a fallback. It is definitely fast so I can't live without it.