4 ms·
This is a simplistic vision. First, not everybody believes they have no consciousness, or ideas. Or cannot generate new ideas. This already happened with 'craz
by two_in_one 3y ago
This is a simplistic vision. First, not everybody believes they have no consciousness, or ideas. Or cannot generate new ideas. This already happened with
'crazy' chess gameplay style. Humans had never seen it before.
Yes, they are tools, build by humans. But this doesn't mean humans can understand what, how, and why they are doing. Historically observations may take hundreds of years to explain.
- anileated 3y agoIf it is admitted to be conscious, idea-understanding, it would be enough like a human and would have to have human rights (and not abused like it currently is). If it doesn’t have human rights, it’s not human-like enough for this to matter. I think these are mutually exclusive.