4 ms·
Google raises for most employees was between 0% and 1%
by remote_phone 3y ago
Google raises for most employees was between 0% and 1%
- bagacrap 3y agoThis is inaccurate. However if your sample is only people who are on Blind complaining, I can see how your data might be skewed in that direction.
- somsak2 3y agoWhat's your sample?
- erhaetherth 3y agoI can offer my sample size of 1. It was 12.4%. L4. "Outstanding" rating.
- remote_phone 3y ago70% were given SI rating. The increase for SI was between 0% and 1%.
- saagarjha 3y agoI know people with that rating who saw a much larger (10-20%) raise. I know others who got a raise in line with what you’ve said too. I don’t know the exact distribution but it’s definitely not “you get 0.5% if you’re SI”.
- remote_phone 3y agoIt is accurate.
- UncleMeat 3y agoI’ve seen the merit lines. Not that many people are at MRP%s that would generate 0% raises for the bulk of SI performers.
- remote_phone 3y agoWhat was the average raise then
- UncleMeat 3y agoI'd need to know the full distribution of MRP% for that. All I'm saying is that merit lines were not such that it was possible for the mean raise to be 1%. It requires way less data to see this.
- remote_phone 3y agoSo you don’t have the data but you know that the mean raise for SI is not 1%. Basically “Trust me bro!”
- UncleMeat 3y agoI have enough data to know that the mean raise is above 1% but to not know the specific value of the mean raise. This is not especially complicated. "Mean raise for SI" is also not what the original post said. It just said "raises for most employees was between 0% and 1%". We can't exclude the higher performers. Zero people on my team had raises below 1% (one was close). Nearly my entire team, including me, received SI for 2022. The merit lines make it clear what %MRP you'd need to be at to get a 1% raise and it is well above the norm.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]