> Also, I don't think that mass is equivalent to energy either. Unfortunately, your argument here is implausible. There have been tens of thousands of experime

> Also, I don't think that mass is equivalent to energy either. Unfortunately, your argument here is implausible. There have been tens of thousands of experiments demonstrating mass to energy conversion. It is the basic principle behind nuclear energy production. Mass energy equivalence is necessary to maintain conservation laws and has been proven by empirical observation. The total mass/energy in the system will not change, however the two can be exchanged for each other. > Information having energy is well known since Boltzmann Information having mass/energy has not been proven. There have been no experiments to support this argument. It is merely a theory. > ..as entropy is measured in J/K Entropy is not a conserved quantity since it will increase within a closed system. The Joules/Kelvin unit comes from statistical mechanics where temperature is defined as a change in entropy per increase in total energy. The entropy used in information theory is different, although related. Entropy in information theory is measured in bits.