3 ms·
Yeah I didn't mean to advocate for Mojo necessarily. I use Python for projects and like a lot about it, but often feel as if its implementations are kind of fra
by derbOac 3y ago
Yeah I didn't mean to advocate for Mojo necessarily. I use Python for projects and like a lot about it, but often feel as if its implementations are kind of fragmented in many respects, and Mojo seems like it could potentially further that trend for me at least, at the current time. Other projects are certainly more open and established.
For me personally what I want to see is a completely open, working, high-performance Python compiler that is fully compatible with official spec 100%, in the sense that you could take any code anywhere and it would work just as well on the official interpreter as on the compiler. Maybe this means creating an official Python 4.0 spec or something that's a superset of 3.0, or something, but right now I'm not sure I see anything quite like that.
I could see Mojo being that eventually but you're right that at the moment it's far from that.