4 ms·

"Maslouh was last year a 34-year old employee of Randstad, which was contracted by Google to identify potential job candidates and enter their publicly availabl

jwestbury 4y ago
> That said, the CIA stuff is presumably fake, given the huge amount of fake personas curated in LinkedIn over the decades for all kinds of nefarious purposes. Plenty of people have open employment with the CIA. They likely need to get specific approval to post that on LinkedIn, but I guarantee many of them are real. Source: Previously held TS/SCI clearance at an intelligence contractor. (I don't recommend cleared work, though, and I've been out of that world for years, thank God.)
- erosenbe0 4y ago
  If you have open employment at the CIA it is a semi-public record. All of the usual things apply like employment verification and creditors or family courts tracking down paychecks for garnishments. I have no idea what the social media policy is though.
- jruohonen 4y ago
  Sure: plenty of people all around the world are quite open with their work on agencies, which I think is a good thing as such. I am just saying that this openness probably then implies that the whole LinkedIn is at the databases of GRU/SVR, MSS/MPS/UFWD, cyber criminals, and whatnot. Thus: On one hand, I cannot say whether that matters; CVs and such are probably worthy of being public for most people. On the other hand, identity theft is an ever-increasing menace. As for fake personas in LinkedIn, there has been quite a lot of academic research on this topic. Though, like in social media, the ratio of real/fake is difficult to contemplate.
  - mikeyouse 4y ago
    There were some fun examples of CIA or NSA folks getting approval to post their roles on LinkedIn - but then adding far too much detail to their profile which exposed previously-unknown intelligence programs. From one talk when it became public in 2015; https://youtu.be/xipI-0HU010?t=371 https://youtu.be/xipI-0HU010?t=371
666satanhimself 4y ago
[dead]
Macha 4y ago
Amazon has gotten contact addresses for me from Gravatar being hacked, so it's not just a matter of "you should have known linkedin will share with anyone". Recruiters, even at major tech companies, are very don't ask don't tell with the vendors that will get them direct contact details for an extra couple of percent in response rate.
- reaperducer 4y ago
  Amazon has gotten contact addresses for me from Gravatar being hacked, so it's not just a matter of "you should have known linkedin will share with anyone". My cat gets spam to his facebook-catname@example.com address. I created the address to segregate his mail from mine. It was only used to sign up for his Facebook account. The cat is long dead, but he still gets spam from whomever Facebook sold/leaked/trusted partered his information to.
- jruohonen 4y ago
  Well like with any kind of a "social network", you'd better always have zero trust. I haven't bookmarked the news, but this case is hardly the first showing that LinkedIn leaks to everywhere. I remember this case from 2019: https://www.troyhunt.com/data-enrichment-people-data-labs-and-another-622m-email-addresses/ https://www.troyhunt.com/data-enrichment-people-data-labs-an... So you have the phone numbers and geolocation stuff there, but mostly it seems to be the usual data brokerage stuff, i.e. useless garbage data.
randominversion 4y ago
"Maslouh was last year a 34-year old employee of Randstad, which was contracted by Google to identify potential job candidates and enter their publicly available information—derived from services such as LinkedIn—into gHire, Google’s applicant tracking system." GDPR defines that it does not apply to individuals for "purely personal or household activity and thus with no connection to a professional or commercial activity." Now if you check the LinkedIn T&Cs your LinkedIn account is your personal account, e.g. it is not your employers account. So anyone using their (personal) LinkedIn account in the course of their job (or other professional/commercial activity) is then potentially subject to GDPR. In the case of Maslouh, based in London, performing work for his employer, Randstad, who themselves were hired to do this work for Google presents a problem with respect to GDPR and his/their "processing" of people's personal data from LinkedIn. Basically it seems that Maslouh is acting at the very least as a Data Processor (and perhaps likely as a Data Controller himself in which case he must register with UK ICO and pay the annual fee) by retrieving personal data from LinkedIn using his own account and then transferring that personal data into Google's gHire system. If Maslouh had used a Randstad LinkedIn account to do so then he personally wouldn't be directly affected by GDPR, though Randstad would - however LinkedIn AFAIK do not offer company accounts at all (rather they provide mechanisms for companys to pay for features that specified individuals' accounts can access). So does Maslouh have a contract in place with Randstad for his to act as a Data Processor for Randstad? Does Randstad have a Data Processor contract in place with Google which indicates that Maslouh is a sub-Data Processor? I raised this fundamental GDPR-related issue of LinkedIn accounts being personal accounts and the implications for recruitment people (both employees of a company and also "contractors" of recruitment agencies) with the UK ICO when they had a "Future of Recruitment" consultation (last year? 2021?). The published ICO consultation document from memory made a vague passing reference to LinkedIn-related implications not currently considered.
- Macha 4y ago
  LinkedIn defining an account as a personal account does not have any bearing on whether the activities someone performs with that account are their personal activities or their employer's business activities in terms of GDPR enforcement

jwestbury 4y ago

> That said, the CIA stuff is presumably fake, given the huge amount of fake personas curated in LinkedIn over the decades for all kinds of nefarious purposes. Plenty of people have open employment with the CIA. They likely need to get specific approval to post that on LinkedIn, but I guarantee many of them are real. Source: Previously held TS/SCI clearance at an intelligence contractor. (I don't recommend cleared work, though, and I've been out of that world for years, thank God.)

erosenbe0 4y ago
If you have open employment at the CIA it is a semi-public record. All of the usual things apply like employment verification and creditors or family courts tracking down paychecks for garnishments. I have no idea what the social media policy is though.
jruohonen 4y ago
Sure: plenty of people all around the world are quite open with their work on agencies, which I think is a good thing as such. I am just saying that this openness probably then implies that the whole LinkedIn is at the databases of GRU/SVR, MSS/MPS/UFWD, cyber criminals, and whatnot. Thus: On one hand, I cannot say whether that matters; CVs and such are probably worthy of being public for most people. On the other hand, identity theft is an ever-increasing menace. As for fake personas in LinkedIn, there has been quite a lot of academic research on this topic. Though, like in social media, the ratio of real/fake is difficult to contemplate.
- mikeyouse 4y ago
  There were some fun examples of CIA or NSA folks getting approval to post their roles on LinkedIn - but then adding far too much detail to their profile which exposed previously-unknown intelligence programs. From one talk when it became public in 2015; https://youtu.be/xipI-0HU010?t=371 https://youtu.be/xipI-0HU010?t=371

666satanhimself 4y ago

[dead]

Macha 4y ago

Amazon has gotten contact addresses for me from Gravatar being hacked, so it's not just a matter of "you should have known linkedin will share with anyone". Recruiters, even at major tech companies, are very don't ask don't tell with the vendors that will get them direct contact details for an extra couple of percent in response rate.

reaperducer 4y ago
Amazon has gotten contact addresses for me from Gravatar being hacked, so it's not just a matter of "you should have known linkedin will share with anyone". My cat gets spam to his facebook-catname@example.com address. I created the address to segregate his mail from mine. It was only used to sign up for his Facebook account. The cat is long dead, but he still gets spam from whomever Facebook sold/leaked/trusted partered his information to.
jruohonen 4y ago
Well like with any kind of a "social network", you'd better always have zero trust. I haven't bookmarked the news, but this case is hardly the first showing that LinkedIn leaks to everywhere. I remember this case from 2019: https://www.troyhunt.com/data-enrichment-people-data-labs-and-another-622m-email-addresses/ https://www.troyhunt.com/data-enrichment-people-data-labs-an... So you have the phone numbers and geolocation stuff there, but mostly it seems to be the usual data brokerage stuff, i.e. useless garbage data.

randominversion 4y ago

"Maslouh was last year a 34-year old employee of Randstad, which was contracted by Google to identify potential job candidates and enter their publicly available information—derived from services such as LinkedIn—into gHire, Google’s applicant tracking system." GDPR defines that it does not apply to individuals for "purely personal or household activity and thus with no connection to a professional or commercial activity." Now if you check the LinkedIn T&Cs your LinkedIn account is your personal account, e.g. it is not your employers account. So anyone using their (personal) LinkedIn account in the course of their job (or other professional/commercial activity) is then potentially subject to GDPR. In the case of Maslouh, based in London, performing work for his employer, Randstad, who themselves were hired to do this work for Google presents a problem with respect to GDPR and his/their "processing" of people's personal data from LinkedIn. Basically it seems that Maslouh is acting at the very least as a Data Processor (and perhaps likely as a Data Controller himself in which case he must register with UK ICO and pay the annual fee) by retrieving personal data from LinkedIn using his own account and then transferring that personal data into Google's gHire system. If Maslouh had used a Randstad LinkedIn account to do so then he personally wouldn't be directly affected by GDPR, though Randstad would - however LinkedIn AFAIK do not offer company accounts at all (rather they provide mechanisms for companys to pay for features that specified individuals' accounts can access). So does Maslouh have a contract in place with Randstad for his to act as a Data Processor for Randstad? Does Randstad have a Data Processor contract in place with Google which indicates that Maslouh is a sub-Data Processor? I raised this fundamental GDPR-related issue of LinkedIn accounts being personal accounts and the implications for recruitment people (both employees of a company and also "contractors" of recruitment agencies) with the UK ICO when they had a "Future of Recruitment" consultation (last year? 2021?). The published ICO consultation document from memory made a vague passing reference to LinkedIn-related implications not currently considered.

Macha 4y ago
LinkedIn defining an account as a personal account does not have any bearing on whether the activities someone performs with that account are their personal activities or their employer's business activities in terms of GDPR enforcement