4 ms·
> People go to theaters for presentation they can't get at home, but that's no guarantee of the best picture and sound. I'm not sure the premise is entirely co
by MrBuddyCasino 3y ago
> People go to theaters for presentation they can't get at home, but that's no guarantee of the best picture and sound.
I'm not sure the premise is entirely correct. I think the main attraction is watching a movie together with other people, because it adds to the emotional experience.
I think this premise is the same mistake phone makers did when all they advertised was technical specs like RAM and GHz and cores, when that is a very reductionist view of the actual experience of using a phone, which apparently only Apple understood. This seems to work well for Open Air cinemas, where picture and sound might just be ok but not great, but you are in nature with other people and its just totally different from some multiplex chain. At least where I live they are regularly sold out.
Now they just have to release movies that are worth watching, which apparently they lost the capability for since around 2017.
- kjs3 3y agoI never got the 'experience' aspect of going to the movie. Sitting in the dark with a pack of strangers you don't really interact with. Some non-zero percentage of whom are rude/entitled further downgrading the experience. And eating bad snacks. With a product on the screen that fails to impress more often than not. I have friends who absolutely adore the movie theatre and consider it a transformative experience. But it just does not resonate with me; does not generate an 'emotion' other than annoyance.
- nanna 3y agoIf you're ever in London go to the Prince Charles Cinema to discover the experience of cinema at its absolute best.