3 ms·
> There are less possible atomic configurations for cars then their is for debris. That doesn't really line up logically. :/
by justinclift 4y ago
> There are less possible atomic configurations for cars then their is for debris.
That doesn't really line up logically. :/
- byyyy 4y agoYou're mistaken and you're intuition is off. It lines up absolutely. Debris is almost any configuration of atoms that are considered trash or unusable. There's are much more ways you can configure atoms to form useless trash then you can to make cars. Case in point "you" can manufacture "debris" or "trash" by throwing something into a trash can. Simple. When's the last time you manufactured a car? Never.
- justinclift 4y agoWow. You're talking atomic scale stuff, but ignoring obvious things like oxidation occurring during an explosion. :/ Seems like a case of you including and excluding things to support your "logic". Ugh.