3 ms·
Why would one side have to say something morally wrong if they don’t actually believe it? What’s the upside?
by AndrewKemendo 4y ago
Why would one side have to say something morally wrong if they don’t actually believe it? What’s the upside?
- sudosysgen 4y agoThe upside is maybe the judge will act upon it favourably.
- HWR_14 4y agoIt might be legally correct but morally wrong. Or it might be an alternative interpretation of ambiguous events, even one that is offensive. A lawyer's job is to present their client's interests in the best light, regardless of what they believe. Many people with bad morals need lawyers.
- AndrewKemendo 4y agoThen it should be made legally wrong right? That’s what should happen next