3 ms·
Well I'm tired of dirtbags making dirtbag arguments in fraud/abuse cases and want people to get publicly punished for doing it instead of sweeping it under the
by BugsJustFindMe 3y ago
Well I'm tired of dirtbags making dirtbag arguments in fraud/abuse cases and want people to get publicly punished for doing it instead of sweeping it under the rug.
- wilg 3y agoWould love to know how much your opinion is based on the actual situation versus the headline or your imagination. Did you read anything past the headline? What is your basis for saying this is a dirtbag argument? Separately, wouldn't you say that losing your fraud/abuse case is public punishment for making dirtbag arguments? Thanks!
- HWR_14 3y agoThe lawyers for the defense have to say something. Usually at least one side is required to say something pretty morally wrong. That's not news. Somehow, I don't think absent this news story, you would have thought SBF was being swept under the rug. It's one of the more high-profile trials.
- AndrewKemendo 3y agoWhy would one side have to say something morally wrong if they don’t actually believe it? What’s the upside?
- sudosysgen 3y agoThe upside is maybe the judge will act upon it favourably.
- HWR_14 3y agoIt might be legally correct but morally wrong. Or it might be an alternative interpretation of ambiguous events, even one that is offensive. A lawyer's job is to present their client's interests in the best light, regardless of what they believe. Many people with bad morals need lawyers.
- AndrewKemendo 3y agoThen it should be made legally wrong right? That’s what should happen next