3 ms·
Think more on what the app does. It allows you to make calls. It needs access to the microphone. But a user likely doesn't want to be forced to keep WhatsApp
by Sohcahtoa82 4y ago
Think more on what the app does. It allows you to make calls. It needs access to the microphone.
But a user likely doesn't want to be forced to keep WhatsApp open as the front screen app while in a call. Maybe they want to open their e-mail or Calendar while in a call. That means the app needs to be able to use the microphone while running in the background.
Though I suppose you could argue that the app should not be allowed to start using the microphone while the app is in the background. Yes, I think that'd be quite reasonable.
- cma 4y agoWhat if you want to answer a call straight from the notification dropdown?
- scarface74 4y agoYou can do that on iOS devices after you explicitly press a button to answer the call
- scarface74 4y ago> Though I suppose you could argue that the app should not be allowed to start using the microphone while the app is in the background That’s the crux of the problem. Why should any app be able to start a listening session without the user’s explicit intervention?
- pedalpete 4y agoVoice control. I can set-up Alexa on my phone to listen for the Alexa keyword. Not that I have that enabled, but it is an option. https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=GYSD4R2L7GA65Q5R https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeI...
- scarface74 4y agoAnd a well designed OS would think about the security implications and it would orchestrate, “when a certain word is heard, launch $x”