3 ms·
To me, this is the "past generations" litmus test I measure any of my personal preferences against. If people were able to handle not-it in 1920, it's probably
by ethbr0 3y ago
To me, this is the "past generations" litmus test I measure any of my personal preferences against.
If people were able to handle not-it in 1920, it's probably a "nice to have" rather than a "must have."
Which, we can all feel very strongly about things that are nice to have, but people were also doing just fine before constant connectivity was a thing.
- williamcotton 3y agoGotta love this guy born in the 1840s complaining about the telegraph being nothing more than a distraction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS27u6IqWt0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS27u6IqWt0
- tomjen3 3y agoIn the 1920s you didn't have email, but the post was delivered multiple times a day. You didn't have telephone, but probably somebody nearby you could call and give a message. You didn't have a freezer, but you had a butcher within walking distance. And you didn't have a phone in your school, but you also didn't have retarded media that spread news that required. Also you could probably have a gun on you, and if it was hunting season there would be plenty of guns in the parking lot to stop a school threat.