4 ms·

I hate that this is downvoted. Content owners have the right to dictate, within the bounds of law, how their content is to be used. The only reason this is con

I hate that this is downvoted. Content owners have the right to dictate, within the bounds of law, how their content is to be used. The only reason this is controversial is because music is usually owned and distributed by the Bad Guys. If this was a case about illegally using GPLed software, for example, there wouldn't even need to be a discussion.

pyre 15y ago
> Content owners have the right to dictate, within > the bounds of law So if he lives somewhere that didn't sign the Berne Convention, then it's ok, right? Or is that where we drop the premise of the 'good == legal' argument and start trying to debate the morality of it?