4 ms·
He can, he just doesn't want to. And if he did we'd probably have no insight into what even happened. The society doesn't even know kings' finances.
by trasz4 3y ago
He can, he just doesn't want to. And if he did we'd probably have no insight into what even happened. The society doesn't even know kings' finances.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> He can, he just doesn't want to. And if he did we'd probably have no insight into what even happened Of course we do, the order would be ignored. (To whom would he even give the order?) English history is written in constitutional crises.
- trasz4 3y ago[citation needed]
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> [citation needed] Well, the death penalty was abolished in the U.K. in the 1990s, so there's that. More significant: habeus corpus, which goes back to somewhere between the Magna Carta and Interregnum. Even at its height, the Crown's power to unilaterally command executions was intentionally curtailed for centuries.