Making an exception to limit a musicians choice of what to do with their property would just be anti-musician. I.e. musicians should be able to pass on their a

Making an exception to limit a musicians choice of what to do with their property would just be anti-musician. I.e. musicians should be able to pass on their assets like anyone else. Creating rat’s nests of laws to fix things in ways that are not thoughtfully deep and wide only further separates the rights of the rich, who can afford legal strategists to dodge narrow scope laws, from everyone else. What is needed are judicial judgements that uphold sensible outcomes, and provide relief (and deterrence) against frivolous speculative litigation. The need for an open system of informed human judgement, to settle fuzzy boundaries based on relevant particulars, is one of the primary purposes of a judicial systems. Micromanaging laws introduce massive opportunities for gaming and unintended harm. And create parasitic constituencies that become devoted to maintaining Byzantine situations.