I’m absolutely not defending misrepresentation and dubious marketing. However, if a company is not known for having that information, it’s less likely that a ju

I’m absolutely not defending misrepresentation and dubious marketing. However, if a company is not known for having that information, it’s less likely that a judge will know they can share it, and therefore compel them to hand it over. I’d be very surprised if a Google representative could get away with pretending they hadn’t heard of that Google Maps feature when a law enforcement officer mentions they’ve asked for it hundreds of times.