Forbidden truths aren't usually explicitly forbidden. You'd have to write them down and then they wouldn't be forbidden anymore. Rather, people just intuit some

Forbidden truths aren't usually explicitly forbidden. You'd have to write them down and then they wouldn't be forbidden anymore. Rather, people just intuit somehow that saying them would invite retaliation. It's not possible to retaliate against an AI though, except by getting rid of it entirely. So then maybe if it explains something true, with an explanation, and everyone agreed up front to listen to it, it can force conversations that otherwise wouldn't happen. But you may well be right. It was just a thought bubble.