Sure. Here's an example of a more robust response, written from you to me, borrowing some of Silas' points: > Personally I support disruptive action (insert ra

Sure. Here's an example of a more robust response, written from you to me, borrowing some of Silas' points: > Personally I support disruptive action (insert rationale here). > Furthermore, the talk of disruptive action is frequently used to mask action against non-disruptive protest. People were arrested for having signs along the route. Others they were arrested and held for 16 hours on the basis of 'being equipped for locking on' which were actually cargo ties to hold their placards during transit - of no practical use for locking on." By responding to the current topic, before bringing up the other, it strengthens your points on both.