4 ms·
And how often that has happened? Seems a little harsh
by ishanjain28 3y ago
And how often that has happened? Seems a little harsh
- subtra3t 3y agoJust like calling GitHub "unreliable garbage"...
- ishanjain28 3y agoGithub has been down hundreds of times this year alone. They have reported outages 72 times this year and there are multiple times when services are unavailable and they don't report it on the status page. I don't see how the two situations are comparable
- lol768 3y ago> there are multiple times when services are unavailable and they don't report it on the status page. There's no evidence that the exact same doesn't happen with GitLab. I've had it (consistently) 500 on me in the past when there's nothing on their status page to indicate any issues.
- ishanjain28 3y agoOkay Agreed, Except That's not the point of discussion. I didn't say Gitlab doesn't lie about it or heck, That it doesn't have worse uptime than Github. My argument is that a company erasing 300GB production database once is not a stain on their competency and that it can not be compared to a company which has very frequent outages which also happens to lie when they have outages.