3 ms·
Kids not learning how to read at 5 or 6 probably has something to do with the teachers and whatever style of teaching they use. I say that because I've seen mo
by hackeraccount 3y ago
Kids not learning how to read at 5 or 6 probably has something to do with the teachers and whatever style of teaching they use. I say that because I've seen motivated parents get their kids reading at younger ages then that. For what it's worth that (getting a four year old to read) is more like a party trick then anything that's actually helpful in my opinion.
All that said the older a kid gets; by 8 or 9 say, the more I tend to suspect there's an issue with the kid or the parents. I think your can use the worst possible teaching technique and by that age most kids should be able to read.
The U.S. puts teachers on a pedestal though where they can either save or ruin children. I don't think it's an accurate view. It puts parents off stage.
- red_admiral 3y ago> I think your can use the worst possible teaching technique and by that age most kids should be able to read. According to the "sold a story" podcast (discussed recently on HN too), that's not true: until kids acquire the skill of decoding the letters on the page, they cannot read unfamiliar words. Teaching them to look at the first letter, then take a guess only makes it worse as you're actively teaching them not to decode, this is how you get the andecdote from a middle school teacher on the podcast about the kid who "read" that "in 1939, Germany INVITED Poland".