5 ms·
That ignores rhythm and chords which are important and distinct. Also given current court rulings stating such non-creative computer generated things are not co
by SideQuark 3y ago
That ignores rhythm and chords which are important and distinct. Also given current court rulings stating such non-creative computer generated things are not copyrightable, it's irrelevant to copyrighted music.
- happymellon 3y agoJust because they aren't copyrightable doesn't mean that we can use them as prior art if we publish them all, does it?
- SideQuark 3y agoNot generally. Prior art works like that for patents. For copyright the courts generally allow copyrights on things created independently of an existing item. So it's likely the whole exercise is worthless at affecting any future copyrights.